The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
isn't it interesting that in both of these situations we see animal models interventional animal models looking completely different than the epidemiology which is confounded hopelessly i would say too often by health user bias and unhealthy user bias
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and we know that with saturated fat that is strongly at play because for the last last 70 years since good old Ansel Keys the healthy people have been avoiding saturated fat and unhealthy people are riding motorcycles smoking shooting guns and