The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
data for this study basically there were no significant differences between the two groups in the animal protein group there was a trend toward increased tgf-beta 1 in the plant protein group there was a trend toward increased calprotectin but neither of those were significant and the rest of the markers were not different between them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
although in this study with the plant diet the calprotectin which suggests um inflammation in the gut was a little more activated than the animal protein arm though it did not reach statistical significance