The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so so 10% of that fructose will be turned into triglyceride right in the intestine and be released into the bloodstream and it is the reason for a post prandial triglyceride response post prandial is uh and I'm including myself in this group is nerd speak for after eating lunch typically it's lunch so that's actually one of the drivers of cardiovascular pathology that intestinal denova lipogenesis turning that fructose into triglyceride right in the intestine
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the characterization here is that fructose goes into fat basically that fructose is harmful for humans and that when you eat fructose it becomes fat the intestine will metabolize of that fructose through what is known as intestinal denova lipogenesis about 10% of that fructose will be turned into fat right in the intestine
so 10% of that fructose will be turned into triglyceride right in the intestine and be released into the bloodstream and it is the reason for a post prandial triglyceride response postprandial is uh and I'm including myself in the script is nerd speak for after eating lunch typically it's lunch so that's actually one of the drivers of cardiovascular pathology that intestinal denova lipogenesis turning that fructose into triglyceride right in the intestine