The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
There's also the behavioral side of things where it's like I'm just going to buy these foods for my house and stop there and just expose my child to these food to the best foods possible at home and I'm not going to say you can or cannot eat things when you're out at a birthday party or doing other things.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And then the hard way on the behavioral side would be like I'm going to try to control everything that goes into my child's mouth or everything that they get exposed to.