Paul Saladino· MD
the adverse uh adverse effects of replacing cis with trans fatty acids are only suggestive and restricted to high trans intakes in subjects with high LP(a) levels.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the adverse uh adverse effects of replacing cis with trans fatty acids are only suggestive and restricted to high trans intakes in subjects with high LP(a) levels.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the trans diet had no adverse effects on LP little a levels when all subjects were considered collectively so they say that's an amounts commonly found in the US diet saturated fatty acids can consistently decrease LP little a uh the adverse adverse effects of replacing cysts with trans fatty acids are only suggestive and restricted to high trans intakes in subjects with high LP little a levels