Peter Attia· MD
But the guidance we're giving people is we we really like to see you at about 1.6 to two.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
But the guidance we're giving people is we we really like to see you at about 1.6 to two.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And the numbers for what more tends to be seem to converge in the ballpark of 1.2 to 1.6 g per kilogram if you're trying to go for a minimum effective dose. Um, but easily up to two, right?
I think that's pretty much what most all the experts agree is that like it's time to change that RDA to that number, right?
You kind of need to start there, and then you can move up, but there's obviously...there's a ceiling. And, you know, we could, obviously, have a discussion about, should it be 1.6 something here, or if you're in a caloric deficit, and I'm like, "Yeah, you could probably stand to eat a little bit more," because, you know, in a calorie deficit, again, you're, sort of, tipping the scales in the favor of the breakdown side of things.
The optimal range for daily protein intake is closer to 1.2 to 1.6 G per kilogram body weight per day or roughly 0.54 to 0.72 G per pound this is based on alternative methods like stable isotope studies which consistently show that higher intakes are necessary to maintain a positive protein balance far above the 0.8 G per kilogram often cited