The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at the animal meat-eating animal nose-to-tail there's nothing toxic in there and that's just the plain you know there's no toxin in there but if you look at plants whether you're looking at a Brassica vegetable like a mustard seed plant or kale or cauliflower there are many plant anti nutrients and plant toxins in that plant
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
almost any mammal almost any mammal you can eat them from head to toe yeah absolutely you can eat them from head to toe without any toxins there are zero known toxins
I think when we imagine where the toxins the fact that plants can have toxins and we think about a spectrum of plant toxicity which I detail in my book and we think where do we get nutrients animal foods were pretty much 85% of the way to a carnivore diet anyway if we're thinking about the lowest toxicity plants and getting the most nutrients nose-to-tail from animals then we're almost to a carnivore diet