Paul Saladino· MD
19 of the 20 people on the committee that made the 2020 to 2025 nutritional guidelines had ties to Industry Pharma food agriculture things like Ilse the international Life Sciences Institute which is widely
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
19 of the 20 people on the committee that made the 2020 to 2025 nutritional guidelines had ties to Industry Pharma food agriculture things like Ilse the international Life Sciences Institute which is widely
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
19 out of the 20 members of the 2020 to 2025 dietary guidelines in the United States in the US government had ties to pharma and to processed food companies with ILSI the International Life Sciences Institute being the biggest funder of but 95% of those people have those ties.
the 2020 to 2025 USDA guidelines committee for like a healthy diet for the United States on that Committee of 20 people 19 people had ties to the pharmaceutical or industrial food system 95% of people on the USDA committee had ties