The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So if we measure a stool test and then we measure a chemical test, the people that have the worst guts, the lowest levels of lactobacillus, which is one of our key stone species, they have the highest levels of glyphosate. So we can directly correlate those two pieces of data together.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Elevated glyphosate equals deficiency in lactobacillus, which is a super important strain for your overall gut health.