The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but I think that for some people if they have underlying gut inflammation that it can be a bad addition and that's that could be an issue a lot of the studies under saturated fat and endotoxin emia or post radial endotoxemia have to
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
most of the problem with saturated fat is in people who have underlying dysbiosis I think there's pretty good evidence that for whatever reason these saturated fats these molecules of fat without you know double bonds without unsaturation between the carbons do you create lipid rafts in a better in a more avid way in the gut and can shuttle and the toxin which live a polysaccharide from grand- organisms
for some of these people it's either a gene allele with the way their body metabolizes saturated fats and shuttles at two different parts of the body or it is some intestinal permeability where the dysbiosis is impacting inflammation levels or both