The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
really so many of these toxins especially oxalates have to do with the integrity of your gut lining and if your gut lining is not healthy probably because you're eating other more toxic parts of plants with lectins or toxic seed oils or have dysbiosis due to over uh zealous use of antibiotics etc if your gut epithelium is not healthy then it appears more likely that you will absorb more oxalates and they can be a real problem
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and again remember the the framing of this conversation is that in someone who has an inflamed gut you may absorb five to ten times more oxalate um
when you're healthy you're only supposed to absorb somewhere between 10 and 15 but any kind of permeable gut issue any kind of gut inflammation which is another reason why the the gastric surgeries increase oxalate absorption because you end up with a kind of a chronic gut inflammation problem with those surgeries you can absorb as much as 67 of the oxalates you're eating