The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think that the the most compelling hypothesis is that it has something to do with the saturated fat to polyunsaturated fat ratio and the higher saturated fat lower polyunsaturated fat ratio leads to a decrease in ldl receptors which leads to an increase in ldl
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's something called the homeobiscus model of membranes that's been promulgated recently whereby people suggest that when you're eating more saturated fat that your body has to increase the ldl to carry more of the cholesterol molecule to make the membranes have a standard level of viscosity fluidity in the membrane
i think that has to do with saturated fat and something called the homeobiscus model i think is the most compelling hypothesis that i
so I think that the level of LDL in your body is in some ways tied to the ratio of saturated to mono and polyunsaturated fats in your diet for a variety of reasons probably having to do with cellular signaling at the level of the liver which influences LDL receptors there and probably some contribution of something called the homeoviscus model