The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in a ketogenic state we burn more fat that it was some astronomical number two to six times more beta-oxidation in the ketogenic athlete so you're burning way more fat so from an endurance perspective someone that's key to adapt it has a clear example because you have a much bigger tank of fat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so I would argue with against change there and I talked about this with Saint efforting I think that what's very clear here is that if you have an equivalent amount of glycogen in your muscles there is nothing to say that a ketogenic athlete could not perform at the same level as a carbohydrate adapted athlete potentially with better benefits because they have more ability to oxidize fats
I think that the benefit you get when you're Akiane kath lead is you can oxidize your fats which means you have more stores you can access the big tank you don't bunk you don't bunk right which is probably why Zack bitter gets such a good is such a high reformer