Andrew Huberman· PhD
Certain things are putrid to us, and we should not consume them, right? At the far end of the spectrum, it's hard-wired for us to avoid those, because they can be dangerous for us. They can make us very, very sick.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Certain things are putrid to us, and we should not consume them, right? At the far end of the spectrum, it's hard-wired for us to avoid those, because they can be dangerous for us. They can make us very, very sick.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.