The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we should be aware of the metal contents of some of the seafoods and I would you know unfortunately again it's probably maybe perhaps too granular for people they just want what works but I think we do need to be aware that seafood is highly polluted with metals and I have seen many people in the carnivore community with high mercury levels when they're eating about the sea bass for instance worth reading about tuna
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you cannot eat tuna every day you cannot even eat salmon every day in my opinion
fish are also quite contaminated with heavy metals be aware of this even if you're eating wild salmon it has significantly more mercury than you're going to get in beef or chicken or lamb or turkey and this is going to accumulate in your body if you're doing things like tuna buyer beware that's a big problem mahi-mahi grouper even those fish have moderate to high levels of heavy metals and the benthic fish too the shellfish the mussels the scallops the clams the lobsters the crabs
more than that I think you're eating some of the more dirty animal Foods on the planet just be aware and check your heavy metals
If you eat fish more than once or twice a week, your heavy metals are going to be elevated unquestionably.
If you want to eat fish more than a few times a week, check your heavy metal levels. Lead, mercury, cadmium. Got to know these things.