We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
i didn't really want to add potatoes they're a nightshade they have all sorts of issues i've spoken about that separately i didn't want to add back grains grains are seeds they have lots of defense chemicals they have gluten they have mold problems with most grains they have digestive enzyme inhibitors oats are high in phytic acid i've spoken about why i'm not a fan of grains like wheat or oats or roots like potatoes specifically as a carbohydrate source
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
grains whether it's brown rice whether it's oats whether it's wheat are simply full of plant defense chemicals even Roots which are a decent source of carbohydrates have more defense chemicals things like potatoes I know you love potatoes but they're nightshades even sweet potatoes have defense chemicals
but I think that in general grains are not a great source of carbohydrates for humans.