The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we put too many calories in our body we become inflamed and that's that's what Lane is talking about and it's right he's right and he's myopic he's getting focused on one little piece of it and missing the whole broader context of nutrient quality and overall food quality we we know that we can't overeat calories that will create inflammation and caloric deficit will remove inflammation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.