The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I mean, I eat any food. You can eat any food, but you don't want to just eat one food. I mean, I eat French fries or burger. There's nothing wrong with it. But if that's your only diet, that's not good. >> Uh if you eat no fruit, that's probably not good. If you have no vegetables in your diet >> and the same, I think with drinks. I mean, I have drinks, but I try not to to get drunk every day, right? Um, so I think moderation is really u I think the the magic.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.