The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the paper proposes by looking and analyzing type 1 diabetics which is non diet induced you know it's more a genetic or other environmental issue type 1 diabetics and they found that the percentage of celiac issues in the type 1 diabetic population was so large combined with other analysis they did they actually suggested in the paper that gluten and plant components may be a big chunk of the calls for type 1 diabetes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.