Andrew Huberman· PhD
I think it's if the plate is a similar color to the food, I think people eat more. Whereas if it's a bigger contrast, they eat less.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think it's if the plate is a similar color to the food, I think people eat more. Whereas if it's a bigger contrast, they eat less.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
even the rate at which you eat and right down to the size of the plate and the color of the plate, the contrast in color--