The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now, at low intensity, that can be problematic, certainly for an athlete, because if they preferentially use carbohydrate at lower intensities, when the exercise demand goes to a higher intensity, they've already exhausted their fuel stores. They can't draw upon fat because the oxidation of that fat is just too slow. So they're essentially now become fatigued because they've already utilized their carbohydrate stores.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If you know athletes or any individual has a you know a high carbohydrate diet, they're going to start to become predisposed to utilizing that fuel source preferentially. Now a low intensity that can be problematic certainly for an athlete because if they preferentially use carbohydrate at lower intensities, when the when the exercise demand goes to a higher intensity, they've already exhausted their fuel stores. you know, they can't draw upon fat because the oxidization of that that fat is just too slow. So, they're essentially now become fatigued because they've they've already utilized the carbohydrate stores.
clearly the the western diet and and you know the modern day diet is heavily driven by processed foods and carbohydrates that you know people become predisposed to utilization of that fuel source um above lipid use fat use um intensities that are very low