The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I would actually hope that within a decade if not less we are at the point where if you can weigh something and take a photograph of it you know we should have enough training data that you should be able to know exactly what is in it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I would actually hope that within a decade if not less we are at the point where if you can weigh something and take a photograph of it you know we should have enough training data that you should be able to know exactly what is in it now that doesn't account for how much of that thing you eat but assuming you you have something that you weigh and you can photograph and you say I ate all of it or I ate half of it that should we should be able to do better than 10% we should be able to do within 5% what is what is the um uh what is the caloric uh density of that food
we should be able to do better than 10% we should be able to do within 5% what is what is the um uh what is the caloric uh density of that food and the the Macer nutrient breakdown
but we have no tools to measure energy intake but it's going to come I bet you that you know within I may not be here but within a couple of decades we'll have a color here which is going to measure your calories coming from fat carbohydrate or protein yeah