Paul Saladino· MD
there was a canadian honey sample study 98 of the honey samples it says here they so this is a pretty pretty good sample size here 200 samples of honey they examined 197 of the 200 had glyphosate residue
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there was a canadian honey sample study 98 of the honey samples it says here they so this is a pretty pretty good sample size here 200 samples of honey they examined 197 of the 200 had glyphosate residue
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
also the manuka honey in new zealand you know the super expensive stuff you and i talked about that last time there was a paper here about that glyphosate in new zealand manuka honey as well