Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
i'd be skeptical that they're even bioavailable to do something you know actively whereas like typically that's like a you know uh i don't know in paracrine function where you have like in intracellular concentrations of hormones being produced and just like eating it is not necessarily yielding like an active effect so i would be skeptical that it even does anything
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i would be skeptical that they're even bioavailable to do something you know actively whereas like typically that's like a you know uh i don't know in