We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
it's irrelevant the study you showed doesn't even matter it's an eight-week crossover study well that could generate a hypothesis yes that's the reason why we generate about then to have some integrity and definitiveness you have to take large numbers of people and go for long periods of time and you have to see outcomes and looks at heart influence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.