The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Anyway, the Maillard reactions are essentially reactions between fragments of proteins and fragments of carbohydrates and fats. The reaction pathways are really complicated. They still haven't been worked out completely, but they generate a bunch of different classes of products. Among those products are sugars.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Maillard reactions are essentially reactions between fragments of proteins and fragments of carbohydrates and fats. ... Among those products are sugars. So you don't start out necessarily with sugars, but if you've got proteins and fats, you can make sugars, - Interesting. - simply with the alchemy of applying heat.
So you don't start out necessarily with sugars, but if you've got proteins and fats, you can make sugars, simply with the alchemy of applying heat.