We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the mistake was that um i didn't read the explanation the authors gave for their smaller size which was their parents were were smaller um and these things um even though that doesn't you know account for um you know being wasted like or stunted um the parents that were a little bit shorter were not that short and and it only it was only the case for four out of the eight children that the parents were a little bit below average in height
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.