We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I would argue the dart trial and the mrct trial should also be excluded from these adequately controlled trials again changing this risk ratio to be significant and in favor of saturated fat Rich diets control diets rather than polyunsaturated fat Rich diets
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in the forest plot he includes the dart trial which had significantly more trans fats in the control group he includes the Minnesota coronary trial like we talked about he includes the medical research council trial which I talked about having more trans fats in the control group