Paul Saladino· MD
I believe that most people would feel better without plants in their diets because of these anti nutrients and toxins and a lot of times people don't even know how good they could feel
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I believe that most people would feel better without plants in their diets because of these anti nutrients and toxins and a lot of times people don't even know how good they could feel
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
my premise my hypothesis is that animal foods with best sources and if you eliminate these plant toxins you will feel better and there's nothing in the plants than you will that you need or is beneficial
the fact that the animal foods can provide all of the nutrients that we need without any plant toxins
I talk about being carnivore ish I talk about just the spectrum of plant toxicity and the notion that animal foods are nutritious we should prioritize them and realize that there are toxins and plant foods and that's it