The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i mean i've eaten um like kielbasa or sausage it's got you know the the pork casing um so and i've always thought about that like you know i'm eating intestine is that good for my gut and you know i think it's definitely plausible it's got all the nutrients to make a gut right in there so — so i think it's definitely plausible it's got all the nutrients to make a gut right in there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.