The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I have heard, I don't know if you have had this experience. I've had Europeans come and say, you know, I ate a lot of bread in Europe and I come here and I I'm like gluten intolerant and then I go back to Europe and I I can have bread again and I I think I don't know this so I'm not a food scientist, but I think that's part of it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.