Paul Saladino· MD
the fact that people vilify roomin and animals which are actually if they are grass fed and properly raised contributing to an increase amount of carbon carrying capacity of the soil and decreasing overall greenhouse gases
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the fact that people vilify roomin and animals which are actually if they are grass fed and properly raised contributing to an increase amount of carbon carrying capacity of the soil and decreasing overall greenhouse gases
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
those animals are actually if they are grass fed and properly raised contributing to an increase amount of carbon carrying capacity of the soil and decreasing overall greenhouse gases
ruminant animals are what we've been eating forever they're a good source of nutrition they do not contribute greenhouse gases in a way that's dangerous to the environment
the environmental impact of roman and agriculture which is nothing like it's made out to be you noted that the earth is in dire straits and every time you turn your head there's another hollywood star saying eat less meat which is completely incorrect in terms of factual impact of ruminant agriculture on the face of this planet