Paul Saladino· MD
99.9% of animals are edible. These are invariably rich sources of bioavailable nutrients.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
99.9% of animals are edible. These are invariably rich sources of bioavailable nutrients.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Only a small fraction of plants are edible. These are invariably poor sources of nutrients that are much less bioavailable.
i think most of these plant nutrients are very poorly bioavailable
clearly you guys are familiar with my work you know that i think most of these plant nutrients are very poorly bioavailable