The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
matter um it's it's usually around 5 to 10% depending on people and and most of your 95% of your gussian distribution Falls in there right so it it is a significant difference but what I would tell people is be cautious about saying well this is why we see huge differences between individuals it pro Maybe for certain individuals but I think for the vast majority of people unless you're literally an outlier uh it's probably going to be somewhere relatively close right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when they look at because they can actually assess how much energy is lost in in feal matter um it's it's usually around 5 to 10% depending on people and and most of your 95% of your gussian distribution Falls in there
when they look at because they can actually assess how much energy is lost in in fecal matter um it's it's usually around 5 to 10% depending on people and and most of your 95% of your Gan distribution Falls in there right so it it is a significant difference but what I would tell people is be cautious about saying well this is why we see huge differences between individuals it pro maybe for certain individuals but I think for the vast majority of people unless you're literally an outlier uh it's probably going to be somewhere relatively close right