Andrew Huberman· PhD
And then someone tapped into the microphone. This was a gentleman representing the American Heart Association-- the American Heart Association. And he proceeded to say that he opposed the removal of sugary soda.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And then someone tapped into the microphone. This was a gentleman representing the American Heart Association-- the American Heart Association. And he proceeded to say that he opposed the removal of sugary soda.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.