The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if the the problem with saturated fat is it's on a sigmoidal curve um and I'll send you the studies if you want but if you take saturated fat intakes of 30 of total calories and reduce it to 12 you're not going to see a decrease in cardiovascular mortality cardiovascular disease cardiovascular anything all cause mortality nothing because it's not enough you haven't crossed the threshold
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
on the other side of the curve saturated Fatin takes below about seven percent there's no change in outcomes if you go from seven percent down to three percent which is impossible to do but you can it's very difficult to show a reduction in cardiovascular mortality or what have you