The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think that if you do all those things we are really doing our best to mimic a carnivorous animal which who knows I mean I think there's a strong argument that humans may thrive on this diet perhaps we are in fact carnivores I think it's a reasonable thing to consider and in that case you want to get all these pieces we know that animals in the zoo are fed bones we know that animals in the wild carnivores in the wild eat bones as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think you have to eat the animal nose to tail like a true carnivore would do if a wolf kills something if a tiger kills something they're gonna eat the whole animal knows the tail they're gonna eat the skin which is collagenous uh connective tissue which is a good source of glycine i've talked about this in my previous videos they're gonna eat the organs we're gonna talk about that a little bit today the the muscle meat as well and then they're also gonna be brains and probably some bones i mean carnivores eat bones too so there's a calcium source there are fat sources in the brain there's marrow there's organs which have unique nutrients relative to the muscles
the carnivore diet isn't a meat-based diet it's an animal-based diet