The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
um if this is accurate and the same thing happens with pop tarts and skittles right the first time humans tasted pop-tarts and skittles we were really doomed until we really figured out like oh wait this is evolutionary programming saying that sugar is good except this is sugar in an industrialized food product so you're you have to really kind of like realize that that your evolution is working against you here
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.