The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
look at the n6 pufa diet look at the cardiolypin levels they're they're a fraction of what they are on a normal diet in mice so yes so even even the even the mice that are poisoned to make them type 1 diabetic are healthier than the mice that are fed seed oils and not poisoned which tells you from a toxicology perspective that seed oils are a worse toxin metabolically than the poison that they're using to make these mice into type 1 diabetics
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.