The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
dha and arachidonic acid are both found abundantly sufficiently in animal uh fats so one you know based on the science at this point you could legitimately get by on just the fatty acid from animals without any requirement for any plant fatty acids
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the longer chain uh n3 and n6 fatty acids dha and arachidonic acid are in fact essential and they just you know this was demonstrated in rodents and then assumed for humans