The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
like when people are actually able to create a nutrient-rich diet even if it has some plans in it when they create a nutrient-rich diet with less plant toxins and more animal foods and more organs the proof is in the pudding they feel better
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you are eating meat and organs either fresh or desiccated like we make it hard in soil for the organs and you're pairing that with some of the least toxic plant foods the fruit the part of the plant that plants actually want you to eat you're probably going to get a lot less of these defense chemicals and you might just feel better