The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, I think some of the first studies we're going to do this year with the ABNRF are repeating that, looking at heavy metals and salts. So, I want to look at some meats and compare nutrient analysis of grass-fed meat versus grain-fed meat. Maybe look at glyphosate levels in some honeys or some meats and things like this.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.