Andrew Huberman· PhD
There's also the issue of caloric density relative to macro and micronutrients, right? a lot of calories but not a lot of nutrition so to speak.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
There's also the issue of caloric density relative to macro and micronutrients, right? a lot of calories but not a lot of nutrition so to speak.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Like tends to be low fiber, high calorie, low fiber for instance.