The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If you believe in it, if you don't, if you're skeptical, or in some cases, you think you should be eating a certain way and then you don't live up to that. It might have even an adverse effect because of the stress and the anxiety associated with that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you think you should be eating eating a certain way and then you don't live up to that, it might have even an adverse effect because of the the stress and the anxiety associated with that.