Paul Saladino· MD
the more meat they could get the more meat they ate and generally the more in their diet the better they do
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the more meat they could get the more meat they ate and generally the more in their diet the better they do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
looking at Western prices work you can see the tribes who ate more plant Foods were generally shorter less muscular and less robust than tribes that ate more animal Foods