The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the greenhouse gas emissions from cows are not the same as new emissions from fracking or technology or other types of carbon so they're very low they're very low they're minuscule compared to the new carbon that is being created by technology by burning fossil fuels etc
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the real story is that technology electricity and all of the things that we treasure are the major contributors to greenhouse gases