Paul Saladino· MD
a lot of people don't have a baseline because their diet is so complicated for people who are eating junk food like how could you possibly know what's making you know what feels good
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
a lot of people don't have a baseline because their diet is so complicated for people who are eating junk food like how could you possibly know what's making you know what feels good
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
because whenever people make one change in their diet and that changes changes to the foods in their diet they're actually changing like 30 or 40 things in their diet and they have a high they're driving idea of what they're doing is only one tiny part of what they're doing
But humans almost never change just one thing.