The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
these foods would probably just fallback foods you know they're they're secondary they're just survival foods if we can dig up a tuber then we can get enough calories to get till tomorrow and then you and I can go hunt an elephant again
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
one of the theses that i advance in my book is that plant foods are really fall back foods if we cannot get fatty animals we are going to have to look for carbohydrates as go-betweens