The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And I'm trying to look forward. Um but you know, I think it sometimes gets in the weeds where people really get concerned about the stuff is, you know, focus on a whole food diet. Like here, what would your great grandparents have had access to? If they were eating this stuff, you're probably evolved to be able to eat this.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
focus on a whole food diet like you know what would your great grandparents have had access to if they were eating this stuff you're probably evolved to be able to eat this