The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
now what has changed has been my perspective on carbohydrates I think that within the original carnivore movement um there was this perception that carbohydrates were not good for humans and that was an interesting thing to to evaluate both personally and critically with the research and that's something I've I've sort of widened my gaze to to incorporate in the last i' would say three to four years at this point
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's just this strongly dogmatic and I appreciate I appreciate passion there's a strongly dogmatic community on YouTube that just can't seem to wrap their heads around the notion that carbohydrates could be beneficial for humans
for me and I think for a lot of people including carbohydrates in their diet whether it's a carnivore diet or an animal- based diet whatever diet it is is a beneficial thing